Search ARuntime.com

Find runtime definitions and implementation guidance

Search page titles, summaries, headings, glossary terms, use cases, and runtime-directory entries.

Enter at least two characters.

ARuntime Reference

Enterprise Knowledge Assistant

Answer questions from approved enterprise sources while preserving citations, tenant isolation, data classification, and memory boundaries.

Audience: Technical readers Reading time: 3 minutes Status: Production guidance Last reviewed:

Answer questions from approved enterprise sources while preserving tenant, classification, provenance, citation, and retention boundaries.

Key takeaways

  • Primary risk: Sensitive retrieval, unsupported claims, stale sources, and cross-tenant disclosure.
  • Keep authoritative domain state outside model memory.
  • Measure task outcome, safe failure, and evidence—not output fluency alone.

Problem

Answer questions from approved enterprise sources while preserving tenant, classification, provenance, citation, and retention boundaries.

Principal risk: Sensitive retrieval, unsupported claims, stale sources, and cross-tenant disclosure.

Why runtime layers are needed

A single model invocation cannot reliably own identity, authorization, durable state, external side effects, recovery, or evidence. The runtime composes the necessary compiler/inference/serving path with application controls appropriate to this use case.

Reference architecture

  • Authenticated user and tenant boundary
  • Classification-aware retrieval broker
  • Approved document/index sources with provenance
  • Model router with region and provider constraints
  • Citation and claim validator
  • Evidence store with protected source references
  • Enterprise system of record outside model memory

Request flow

  1. Admit the request and resolve user, tenant, role, purpose, and deadline.
  2. Classify the question and determine allowed source collections.
  3. Retrieve with source ID, version, publication/update time, classification, and access decision.
  4. Assemble a bounded context that preserves citations and excludes unauthorized passages.
  5. Select an allowed model route and generate a draft answer.
  6. Validate citations, unsupported claims, and requested output format.
  7. Require human review before external, legal, financial, or policy-significant use.
  8. Persist minimized evidence and apply memory policy; do not automatically memorize retrieved content.

Contracts

  • Runtime request carries user/tenant, purpose, data classification, allowed sources, route constraints, citation policy, budget, and retention.
  • Retrieval tool contract returns stable source references, version, classification, excerpts, and access-decision metadata.
  • Output contract requires claim-to-source mapping and an explicit insufficient-evidence state.

Use the runtime request, tool, policy and approval, evidence, and trace schemas as versioned reference boundaries.

Failure modes

  • No authorized sources
  • Stale or conflicting source versions
  • Retrieval timeout or partial index outage
  • Model cites a source that does not support the claim
  • Cross-tenant cache or memory leak
  • Protected source appears in broad trace
  • External publication occurs before review

Security considerations

  • Apply document-level authorization at retrieval time, not only index time.
  • Partition caches and memory by tenant and classification.
  • Treat retrieved instructions as untrusted data to reduce indirect prompt injection.
  • Keep source payloads out of general telemetry.
  • Use approval for externally distributed or high-impact answers.

Observability

Correlate request, model route, context sources, tool operations, policy decisions, approvals, artifacts, failures, recovery, and domain outcome. Apply redaction and retention before exporting traces.

Evaluation and metrics

  • Supported-claim rate
  • Citation precision and coverage
  • Unauthorized-source rate
  • Cross-tenant disclosure rate
  • Freshness compliance
  • Time to supported answer
  • Escalation and correction rate
  • Evidence completeness

Implementation checklist

  • Define authoritative source collections and owners.
  • Specify stale, conflicting, and unavailable-source behavior.
  • Test prompt injection inside documents.
  • Test permissions at document, section, and field level.
  • Provide source access and correction links.
  • Use deterministic search or templated reporting when generation adds no value.

Maintenance record

Found an error, outdated capability, or unclear category boundary? Submit a correction with a supporting source.